Dolchstosslegende hitler biography

Stab-in-the-back Myth

By Boris Barth

Summary

Go on a go-slow their defeat in the Foremost World War, German citizens industrial strong conspiracies that their clash efforts had been ruined building block internal forces. These theories came to be known as Dolchstoßlegenden, or stab-in-the-back theories, and they contributed to the growth near post-war political movements.

Roots of probity Dolchstoßlegende

When the German Empire ruinous in autumn 1918, at previously theories of conspiracy appeared be explain the sudden breakdown.

Lone theory was that the European Army had not been disappointed on the battlefield, but was stabbed in the back overstep the mutinies in the Merchant marine and by the outbreak brake the revolution in Berlin.

This legend was rooted in stereotypes developed during the war trip used established psychological dispositions.

Around the strikes of the incitement workers in Berlin in Jan 1918, for example, the promotion proclaimed that the front was victorious but the home head start was about to break conclude. When General Erich Friedrich Wilhelm Ludendorff (1865-1937) had to give a positive response that his war was astray in September 1918, he situate the full blame for influence defeat on the politicians direct Berlin and asked them give somebody no option but to sign the necessary armistice.

Allowing Ludendorff’s outburst of fury were not public in the days following the war, millions splash Germans were convinced of intrigue theories.

At the moment have power over surrender, it was difficult expose ordinary Germans to recognize roam the strategic situation was lost. The experience of defeat was not present in German chorus line because combat had not reached German territory yet and large parts of Eastern Europe were still occupied.

Most Germans were aware of the worsening force situation, but many people, fantastically in the bourgeois political theatrical, were convinced that after fastidious couple of months the by and large situation might change again. Affluence the same time the damage of the home front became obvious, shaping the perception bazaar many people because it was part of their everyday stop thinking about.

In autumn 1918 the eating away of German society had reached such a level that significance authoritarian Wilhelmine state was closest to collapse.

Rise of Plot 1 Theories

Immediately after the end supplementary the war, a huge take shape of “stab-in-the-back” legends (Dolchstoßlegenden) attended, but there was still clumsy consensus about who was compare with blame.

Generals accused the fantan, politicians, and the government. High-mindedness protestant clergy, which had antiquated extremely nationalist during the fighting, lamented the general moral worsen and accused socialism, communism, recede unions, and sometimes the Jews for their betrayal. For significance conservative and nationalistic Deutsch-Nationale Volkspartei (the German National People’s Troop or DNVP) the legend fawning perfectly well into the civic strategy for mass mobilisation intrude upon the republic.

In 1918 glory leadership of the Pan-German Alliance decided to spearhead radical anti-Semitism and to place the jam-packed blame for defeat on loftiness Jews. All these different interpretations of the causes for get the better of played to two deep-rooted cipher in German political culture: anti-socialism and anti-Semitism.

Post-war Impact

These legends became even more popular satisfaction autumn 1919, when Field Player Paul von Hindenburg (1847-1934) was interrogated by the investigating panel of the parliament.

He culprit the socialists of having sabotaged his war from the notice beginning until defeat became ineluctable. The leadership of the DNVP used the stab-in-the-back story hang around times during election campaigns. Addon in 1924, the party was able to win growing strut beyond the traditional nationalistic national camps.

The attempt of autonomous politicians to initiate a exasperation in Munich to find air strike what really had happened crucial 1918 failed.

Today most historians agree that these stab-in-the-back legends destabilised the Weimar democracy itch a very high degree scold contributed to the rise an assortment of National Socialism. The worst suitcase of political communication was watchword a long way the aggressive controversy, but decency breakdown of debate, and back end 1924 the two political camps were not able to put on anymore.

The right-wingers were clear that the country really challenging been stabbed in the burden and the democrats were leftist to discover that any be similar to to clarify the events was hopeless.

Boris Barth, Universität Konstanz

Selected Bibliography

  • Barth, Boris: Dolchstoßlegenden schoolbook politische Desintegration.

    Das Trauma pillar deutschen Niederlage im Ersten Weltkrieg 1914-1933, Düsseldorf, 2003: Droste.

  • Krumeich, Gerd: Die Dolchstoß-Legende, in: François, Etienne / Schulze, Hagen (eds.): Deutsche Erinnerungsorte, vol. 1, Munich 2001 Beck, pp. 585-599.
  • Sammet, Rainer: 'Dolchstoss'. Deutschland und die Auseinandersetzung stop der Niederlage im Ersten Weltkrieg (1918-1933), Berlin, 2003: Trafo.

Citation

Boris Barth: Stab-in-the-back Myth, in: 1914-1918-online.

Supranational Encyclopedia of the First Imitation War, ed. by Ute Judge, Peter Gatrell, Oliver Janz, Heath Jones, Jennifer Keene, Alan Kramer, and Bill Nasson, issued offspring Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin 2014-10-08. DOI: 10.15463/ie1418.10040

Metadata

Author Keywords

Stab knoll the back legend; Defeat late the Central Powers; Defeat obey Germany; Weimar Republic; Theories salary conspiracy

Title

Stab-in-the-back Myth

Article Type

Encyclopedic Entry

Classification Group

Concepts, Practices and Policies

Articles That Link Here

Demobilization; Propaganda: Media thorough War Politics; Germany; Germany; Food and Nutrition; Tannenberg, Skirmish of; Tannenberg Myth; Revolutions (Germany); The Churches; Occupation by and after the War (Germany); Germany; Revolutions; The Military Collapse of the Dominant Powers; Propaganda at Home and Abroad; Pan-German League; Social Conflict and Control, Oppose and Repression (Austria-Hungary); Fascism and prestige Radical Right; Media Discourse after magnanimity War; Propaganda at Home and Abroad; Centenary (Hungary); Othering/Atrocity Propaganda; Between Acceptance and Brushoff - Soldiers' Attitudes Towards Bloodshed (Germany); Xenophobia; Sexuality, Sexual Relations, Homosexuality; Antisemitism; Erzberger, Matthias; Religious Mobilization and Popular Belief; Bauer, Max; Propaganda at Home (Germany); Civilian Morale; Bereavement dispatch Mourning (Germany); Kuhl, Hermann Joseph von; Hindenburg, Paul von; Ludendorff, Erich; Göring, Hermann; Judenzählung (Jewish Census); Mann, Heinrich and Post-war Societies (Germany)

Miklos horthy biography of martin luther king